Force and Flow — Know and Change – optimisticDuelist – Medium

Here’s the last one of this Classpect essay series! This is on the Know and Change pair, the quartet of classes closest to the Spectrum:

Mage and Seer & Heir and Witch 

Coming soon will be:

  • More Homestuck Explained videos, covering Homestuck’s core themes from beginning to end
  • Writing about Jane Crocker, Davekat, the Alpha Timeline… . 
  • Hiveswap lore and analysis, linking the game to Hiveswap once it comes out and probably handing streams and such if all goes well!
  • And more stuff as I think of it, too. Really, figuring out the Classpect system made me realize we’ve only scratched the surface of Homestuck (it keeps happening), and this is only the beginning of a new extreme.

If you can spare me a buck a month you can help me make all this content and, like, not die and stuff– and get your hands on it earlier, too! Higher reward tiers will let you invite friends to the Discord so they can access this stuff and talk about it, too!

Feel free to @ me, reblog or send me an ask with your thoughts on these first two essays. There may be some things I can’t answer as they will be answered in later posts, but I might use those as inspiration for what teasers to release from sections of the next two essays over the course of the week.

You can also feel free to talk to me in the Hiveswap Discord where I moderate and cry about Homestuck. I’m very interested in seeing how my thoughts stand up to scrutiny, so don’t be shy!

[Patreon] [Hiveswap Discord]

[Active/Passive Masterpost] [Destroy and Create] [Serve and Steal

Force and Flow — Know and Change – optimisticDuelist – Medium

Here’s the second tear for the  Know/Change pair, talking about some cool stuff re: John’s relationship with his Magic trick books 😉

Not gonna lie, this is the essay I’m most excited for, and the Change/Know classes have ratcheted upwards to become what are likely my favorites. 

You can access this essay early by hooking up with my Patreon–otherwise you’ll be able to read it tomorrow, when I post it here! You can also talk to me about it on the Hiveswap discord and on the r/Hiveswap subreddit. And here on Tumblr, obviously 😉

Keep rising,

[Patreon] [Hiveswap Discord]

[Active/Passive Masterpost] [Destroy and Create] [Serve and Steal

Here’s the first teaser for the last essay, on the Know and Change classes! This one on Terezi pulling off something that could be described as a Miracle 😉 (No association to bad clowns)

Not gonna lie, this is the essay I’m most excited for, and the Change/Know classes have ratcheted upwards to become what are likely my favorites.

You can access this essay early by hooking up with my Patreon–otherwise you’ll be able to read it on Thursday, when I post it here! You can also talk to me about it on the Hiveswap discord and on the r/Hiveswap subreddit. And here on Tumblr, obviously 😉

Keep rising,

[Patreon] [Hiveswap Discord]

[Active/Passive Masterpost] [Destroy and Create] [Serve and Steal]

ymawgat:

revolutionaryduelist:

ymawgat:

(@revolutionaryduelist I’m starting a new post cause the last one was getting a bit long)

For now I’d just be curious to know: In what way would you say Karkat “exploits” Blood? He’s not really cognizant of where his strengths lie even by the end, and yet he routinely solves conflicts by establishing bonds almost magically.

And what about Jake in the Masterpiece? There might be ambiguity to Karkat and Tavros (I’d argue Tavros’ behavior is much more in line with exploitation, but I already did so I won’t here), but Jake’s final act in the story is wielding his gay hope bubble against Caliborn as a weapon, which he does specifically because he, himself, decides he wants to save Dirk.

That seems much more in line with exploitation than with allowance to me–it’s willful, conscious and pre-determined.

Keep reading

real quick cuz today’s a busy day but 

Keep reading

Also I’m definitely interested in hearing your take on the contrast between Seer/Mages and Knights/Pages! I should be clear that I think the Classes, like the Aspects, can resonate in all kinds of different ways. 

I really don’t think the nuance ends at what classes are Active/Passive pairs, or what the key verbs are. So i’m always interested in hearing people’s takes on how they’re connected, regardless of disagreement over the pairings I think they’re still relevant and interesting. 

Cool! I’ll write it up when I get the chance, but for now I’ll respond to a couple of things you mentioned.

Keep reading

Haha I appreciate it, but all of Homestuck is personal to me. It’s incredibly hard to upset me in general, and even if I *were* to get upset, I would try to consider why I was upset and deal with it. 

I’m not trying to advance and insist on my version of Homestuck, and I actively strive against letting my emotional investment interfere with my view of the comic.

I don’t like using the word “objective” because the concept as it applies to this is inherently false, so instead I’d say I’m interested in what Homestuck, as a complete, cohesive work, adds up to and tries to say in totality.  I part from the starting premise that Homestuck is coherent and meaningful and has things to say. I also think it’s ruleset is applied consistently–it’s just more complicated than it seems like at first glance.

So yeah, I’m invested in Dirkjake. But that doesn’t mean I want to steer clear from being questioned about it and challenged on the basis of the canon–and in those terms I’ve faced much harsher rebuttals than you, anyhow 😛

Me being invested in Dirkjake means I want to push the fandom and make it aware of alternate perspectives and new views. I want conversation and if necessary rhetorical conflict, not stagnation in the status quo reading of Homestuck as mediocre and Dirkjake as vague/ambiguous at best and mediocre at worst. 

I want those things because I think Dirkjake–and Homestuck at large–deserve it. I think these are better stories than they’re given credit for, and I’m trying to put words to why. 

If I were doing anything less than trying to revolutionize the way people think about Homestuck and putting my own views of it on the line to be put under scrutiny in the name of advancing a view of it that stands a chance at getting people excited about the comic like they used to be, I wouldn’t be trying to make a job out of it. 

But I’m not going to accomplish real change in the fandom’s thought sphere solely through pleasant conversations (this conversation so far has been extremely pleasant btw). I have to be comfortable with being challenged and questioned if I want to change anything. 

And if I can’t argue a point as concisely and completely as possible by using the canon as my source, then it just means that Homestuck isn’t exactly what I think it is–either because it’s not clear enough about making the points I’m trying to argue to give me evidence that holds any real conviction, or because I’m misunderstanding what it’s trying to say altogether. 

In both cases, that information would also be valuable to me. 

Honestly I should prob put this in my about or something. It would help rhetorically if people knew where I’m coming from with all this. 

Anyway, 

I do think however, that in homestuck, in reference to classes, it implies “use against the will of the aspect”?

Yeah, that’s what throws me. I don’t remember anyone in the comic so much as implying that. The closest thing I can think of is that by saying passive classes act “through the will of the Aspect”, maybe some have taken that to mean Active classes work against that will?

If that’s the root of the view, then I’m skeptical. Mainly because I think framing it as Active players being a Yang force on their Aspect is cleaner, and more in line with the Ying/Yang mentality Calliope explicitly establishes. 

That doesn’t imply that they’re acting against the Aspect’s will–it implies that the Aspect is reactive to their wills, and moves to accomplish what that will desires. 

Maybe there’s an implication or statement that I’m missing somewhere that implies that more “contentious” relationship though, in which case I’d appreciate having it pointed out to me for sure. 

AR’s actions aren’t a manifestation of Dirk’s powers, his existence is, and we don’t know that Dirk can’t control BGD, especially since the “I failed” line to John seems to imply (at least to me) that he was attempting to do more than just flying full pelt towards the medium?  

I’ve always interpreted it that BGD was one of Dirk’s soul splinters?

Like, in the same way that a waking and dreaming self are paradoxically the same person and also different people, BGD was both Jake’s subconscious puppeteering Jake’s perception of Dirk and an actual sentient being with his own consciousness and stuff?

As for AR: Exactly.

AR’s existence is a manifestation of Dirk’s Heart, and AR is also a Prince of Heart as such. Dirk’s struggle is that he technically has the power to stop his other Self, but instead keeps allowing him to do what he’s doing because he feels he owes it to him due to the moral implications of his very existence.  

As for BGD: This is correct. Dirk is explicitly one of Dirk’s splinters:

TT: I don’t think one of Dirk’s splinters could exist nearly as well in anyone’s mind other than yours.

But that doesn’t mean he’s a vector for Dirk. He’s essentially Jake’s imaginary friend, who takes the form of Dirk as expressed through all of Jake’s thought patterns about him:

GT: So im talking to myself! Thats kind of stupid!
TT: Well, yeah. But not quite.
TT: You could view me as a projection of the real Dirk within your mind, as expressed through all of your thought patterns about him.
TT: So I’m kind of a splinter of his corporeal self who happens to live in your awareness. 

GT: There is something that feels kind of weird about this. You being in my head… its a little messed up!
TT: What’s messed up about it?
TT: You were the one who put me here, with your intimate understanding of all his mannerisms and predilections.

The root of BGD’s behavior isn’t what Dirk himself would do, but what Jake thinks of him at any given time–and what Jake thinks is colored by AR conflating and muddying his and Dirk’s personalities. But even so, Jake himself draws a distinct difference between BGD (and AR’s) behavior and Alpha Dirk’s:

GT: No offense but I kind of get the same smartass vibe from you as i do from the responder.
GT: Like har har i have the same basic personality as dirk but without any accountability or anything so let me just be kind of flippant and mess with this jake fellas head!
GT: You know what im saying?
TT: Yes.
TT: That’s a surprisingly decent observation about me.
GT: Yeah see i think i maybe did a little TOO good of a job brain cloning you? This is way too much like talking to the REAL fake dirk.

And that divide grows wider later on. What Dirk likes about Jake above all else is Jake’s faith in him, and Dirk breaks up with Jake and talks about how he thinks he was toxic and bullying to him. 

So if Dirk is actually in control of Brain Ghost Dirk at all, wouldn’t his priority upon contacting Jake be, like, apologizing or something? Or trying to find out what’s going on in the session while he’s trying to fly back in after getting zapped out by Jade?

But Brain Ghost Dirk doesn’t do any of that. Instead we get:

DIRK: You’ve never really believed in anyone your whole life, and you know it.
DIRK: Everything’s always about you. Don’t you remember? You already had this epiphany, dingus.

DIRK: Will you stop crying?
DIRK: It’s reflecting poorly on both of us.
JAKE: (Sorry.)
JAKE: (*Sniff.*)
DIRK: Hey.
DIRK: Did you shave your legs? 
JAKE: (No i think the magic god tier fire burned it all off…) 
DIRK: God damn. 
DIRK: They’re so smooth. 
DIRK: A car could swerve outta control on those gams. 

Which is…a pretty drastic difference in mindset and characterization.
At the very least, you’d expect Dirk to use his connection to Brain Ghost Dirk to do recon or try to find out what’s going on, but he doesn’t do that.

And it’s hard to imagine Dirk flirting with Jake after the speech he gave Jane, let alone calling himself Jake’s boyfriend without having talked to him yet. Especially since we know that throughout all this Dirk is carrying around the view of himself that eventually comes out once he talks to Dave.

If you think Brain Ghost Dirk is his own different, separate Dirk, then sure. But he’s still simultaneously a reflection of Jake’s mind, and linked to it. If he was acting against Jake’s will in any way or doing his own thing, wouldn’t the comic need to telegraph that somehow? 

Hence why I think Occam’s razor leads me to think BGD is just accomplishing what Jake wants to get done, and thus his creation is Jake benefiting himself. 

Sure but like, if the Hope was only being controlled by Jake, then why would it expand out in any direction other than at Caliborn?

I mean, Caliborn is a Time player, so creating a bigass field he can’t dodge doesn’t sound like a bad idea to me.  But really my answer to “why a Hope bubble” is that that’s how Hussie wanted to present his powers. 

And I don’t think the Masterpiece presents Jake as wholly in control of his powers–seems to me like in this timeline it’s likely the first time he awakens them. A really big deal is made of the fact that Jake gets absolutely furious about Caliborn beating up Dirk, and that he wants to save him, and that the outburst exhausts him. Seems like a climactic moment of personal development to me. 

I will, however, note the fact that the Hope field encompasses the other Alpha kids too, and while it hurts Caliborn, it doesn’t hurt them–Which is suggestive of some degree of control. 

I’d also note that the most Passive player–Alt Callie–is able to precisely create a Black Hole conciously and of her own accord. That is precise and deliberate the way Aradia and Jade demonstrate their powers is. 

uu: AS A LORD OF TIME. I THINK I’M GOING TO MASTER TIME. NOT WITH MY BRAIN. WHICH WOULD BE TOO HARD. BUT WITH MY INSTINCTS.
uu: LIKE IN A WAY THAT WORKS WITH MY NATURAL IMPULSES. SUCH AS MY AMBITION. MY WILL TO COMMIT MAYHEM. MY DESIRE TO PUNISH THOSE I DESPISE.

Caliborn, in contrast, subjugates the Alpha Timeline without actually having to think about how–he does it through pure willpower and desire, and leaves controlling the minutiae to underlings and proxies. He isn’t particularly thinking in terms of precise control–he just sees what he wants and gets it. Time works it all out for him. 

So I’m not sure the level of direct control the classes exhibit is really the determining factor in how Active/Passive they are. It seems to me to rely much more on achieving their own wills vs. benefiting the wills of others. 

Anyway that’s all for now cause I got kinda sidetracked today but I might have more to say later. Curious to hear your responses!

Force and Flow — Steal and Serve – optimisticDuelist – Medium

Here’s the second of the class essays, covering the Steal and Serve pair, the four classes that take up the middle of the spectrum:

Thief & Rogue and Page & Knight. 

The next essay–on the Change & Know pair–is available in it’s entirety for my Patrons, so if you can spare me a buck a month you can get it and more content early if you decide you like it enough. Higher reward tiers will let you invite friends to the Discord so they can access this stuff and talk about it, too! 

Feel free to @ me, reblog or send me an ask with your thoughts on these first two essays. There may be some things I can’t answer as they will be answered in later posts, but I might use those as inspiration for what teasers to release from sections of the next two essays over the course of the week.

You can also feel free to talk to me in the Hiveswap Discord where I moderate and cry about Homestuck. I’m very interested in seeing how my thoughts stand up to scrutiny, so don’t be shy!

Keep Rising.

[Youtube] [Patreon] [Hiveswap Discord]

[Active/Passive Masterpost] [Destroy and Create] [Know and Change]

(PS: Special thanks to @theworstpersonintheworld for informing me about the Serve verb. Still misleadingly titled, still owe ya a life debt. Thanks!)

Force and Flow — Steal and Serve – optimisticDuelist – Medium

ymawgat:

revolutionaryduelist:

ymawgat:

revolutionaryduelist said: Definitely the latter, I mean–I only picked up on the fairy god troll and gnome things because you messaged me! I’d be curious to know who you pair with Sylph/Maid and what the root of your disagreement is, if you find you have the time–but hopefully my reasoning will come into clearer focus with the next two essays :B

Thank You!! 😀

In answer to your question @revolutionaryduelist​ to be honest you’ve sold me on the Sylph/Maid pairing more than anyone else (Dahni, BKEW, etc) has. The root of my disagreement now is definitely more that I just can’t see Heirs and Witches being a pair?

Keep reading

Hmmm yeah, it looks to me like most of this is stuff I address in some way or another over the next two essays, so I’m going to play a bit coy with the caveat that I’m excited to hear what thoughts/critiques you have of those when they come out 😉 

I do want to respond to some stuff, though:

Keep reading

Hey @revolutionaryduelist​, I’m going to hold off most of my counter arguments until I’ve seen your Witch/Heir post, but there’s one thing I would like to point out, namely-

The Master/Servant dynamic you suggest is interesting, but it suggests Knights are Active to Page’s Passive, which I strongly disagree with now (I used to consider it true).

-I’d argue that which class is more selfless and self-centered isn’t the only thing to look at when deciding which class is active and passive. 

Going back to what Calliope has to say on the matter:

image
image

X X

Aside from the selfish/selfless dichotomy, two other main concepts stand out to me:

  • Firstly, active classes directly do things to or through their aspect, whilst Passive classes do things indirectly, “allow”ing and “invite”ing their key verb to be actuated.

I’d argue that Knights more often do things directly through their aspect and that Pages more often do things indirectly?

For example Tavros assembles an army using metaphorical Breath, and in doing so invites/allows combat through his aspect. Similarly Jake uses Hope to allow Dirk to fight (or “Serve” as I know you’d put it) Aranea, and the way he uses his hope powers very much feels like he’s “allowing Hope” to beat down Jade and Caliborn, rather than consciously an directly using it? 

  • Secondly, active classes “exploit” their aspect, while passive classes use their powers “as if by the will of the aspect”.

You may say that this point is a lot more subjective, and I’d agree with you, except that we have this quote from Aradia:

image

Note the explicit use of the word “exploit”.

That’s all I wanted to say really, thanks for reading!

I won’t go into tooo much depth because my post on Steal/Serve is going up literally tomorrow, but I will say you’re definitely correct here! I hold to Selfish/Selfless solely because I think it’s the most consistent element of characterization with regards to the Active and Passive classes.

Basically, I think the most critical element to determining Active/Passive is the “For oneself” or “For Others” distinction. Exploitation and Allowance come into it, but are more complicated. The next essay should make what I mean a lot clearer there. 

For now I’d just be curious to know: In what way would you say Karkat “exploits” Blood? He’s not really cognizant of where his strengths lie even by the end, and yet he routinely solves conflicts by establishing bonds almost magically. 

And what about Jake in the Masterpiece? There might be ambiguity to Karkat and Tavros (I’d argue Tavros’ behavior is much more in line with exploitation, but I already did so I won’t here), but Jake’s final act in the story is wielding his gay hope bubble against Caliborn as a weapon, which he does specifically because he, himself, decides he wants to save Dirk. 

That seems much more in line with exploitation than with allowance to me–it’s willful, conscious and pre-determined. 

So it seems to me that there’s definitely ambiguity here. I’m excited to see if I was successful in my attempt to clarify that ambiguity tomorrow :B 

Here’s the second teaser for one of the next essays, on the Steal and Serve classes! Where Roxy helps us see what it might mean to be on the Active/Passive spectrum. 

You can access this essay early by hooking up with my Patreon–otherwise you’ll be able to read it on Thursday, when I post it here! You can also talk to me about it on the Hiveswap discord and on the r/Hiveswap subreddit. And here on Tumblr, obviously 😉

Keep rising,

[r/Hiveswap Subreddit]

[Youtube] [Patreon] [Hiveswap Discord]

ymawgat:

revolutionaryduelist said: Definitely the latter, I mean–I only picked up on the fairy god troll and gnome things because you messaged me! I’d be curious to know who you pair with Sylph/Maid and what the root of your disagreement is, if you find you have the time–but hopefully my reasoning will come into clearer focus with the next two essays :B

Thank You!! 😀

In answer to your question @revolutionaryduelist​ to be honest you’ve sold me on the Sylph/Maid pairing more than anyone else (Dahni, BKEW, etc) has. The root of my disagreement now is definitely more that I just can’t see Heirs and Witches being a pair?

Keep reading

Hmmm yeah, it looks to me like most of this is stuff I address in some way or another over the next two essays, so I’m going to play a bit coy with the caveat that I’m excited to hear what thoughts/critiques you have of those when they come out 😉 

I do want to respond to some stuff, though:

I do want to clarify, I think the key verb for Heirs and Witches is “Change”, not “Manipulate”, which I’d regard as a more specific sub-verb that could fall under the Change label. 

The Master/Servant dynamic you suggest is interesting, but it suggests Knights are Active to Page’s Passive, which I strongly disagree with now (I used to consider it true). I will say you’re closer than you think though, because according to wikipedia Pages were already considered Knights in Training anyway–a Squire is just a pretty well-trained Page, so you don’t need the middle step. 

In fact, reconsidering Knights and Pages is where all this started. I’ve already written about them extensively in public, though I have a lot to add in the essay about them, but the gist is that I consider them the closest thing to a “Give” class, and thus the obvious counterpoint to Thieves/Rogues. 

I think you’re onto something with the connection between Witches and Fairies in particular, btw–nothing I have super canonical evidence for outside of Jane, but suffice it to say I DO think there are ways classes thematically resonate with each other even if they’re not paired–just like many think Aspects do. It brings some interesting stuff to light, in my view. 

As for the Unifying Myths, I currently only use Unifying Myths that are, in canon, tied to particular classes. IE: Ones that recur again and again related specifically to a pair of classes (instances of roleplay like Vriska’s also show up to muddy the waters elsewhere, but they are similarly resolved.), and which tell us interesting things about how both classes can be read. 

Hence why I don’t list any for Prince/Bard and Rogue/Thief–I could probably hazard some guesses, but they don’t seem thematically or mechanically tied together by any notable trends I’d feel comfortable pointing to, other than the obvious key verbs we were given in the first place. 

I also want to say that I struggled for the longest time with Heirs/Witches exactly because of this–I tossed some guesses, but hadn’t identified a Unifying Myth for them. I also struggled with the “Change” verb for a long time because it felt too broad to me, before I finally parsed it in a way that made sense along with “Know”. 

You can get a sense of both how I think about Witches and how I was struggling with Change even quite recently in this post on Jade, btw. 

If you think about it, all the classes Know things about their aspect or through their aspect, too. So whether you use Know or Understand, the Seer/Mage pair also seems sort of redundant. I think the relative broadness of these verbs is intentional, and is the reason why Eridan beat out Sollux in their little magic duel. 

I don’t want to spoil the surprise as to how I think Change/Know work because I’m really proud of that essay in particular, but I owe a debt to a couple pals for pointing me in the right direction there, because I was honestly about to make these posts with a big old :shrug: for the Heir/Witch dynamic before I made the links that changed everything. That wasn’t a purposeful pun, I promise. 

Also, I’ll let you know if you come off mean or something, but for now you’ve seemed entirely earnest and in good faith about this stuff, and I love having to question and shore up my views to make sure they actually do hold up under scrutiny! I appreciate the insight a lot and you’ve been great, no worries 🙂

Force and Flow — Destroy and Create – optimisticDuelist – Medium

revolutionaryduelist:

Here’s the first of the Class essays, where we go over the most intense Active/Passive dichotomy, putting these Classes on the furthest ends of the spectrum. 

The Key Verbs for these classes are Destroy and Create, covering
Princes and Bards & Maids and Sylphs, respectively. 

Quick disclaimer so I don’t get anyone’s hope’s up: This essay doesn’t include much discussion of Jane Crocker! Not because she isn’t relevant, but because I actually ended up writing this entire series because I needed to lay out my thoughts on Maids so I could get around to writing my essay about her. 

I’ll be linking to my Jane post at the end of this essay once it’s up, and this essay is pretty much required reading for it! So I think it’s worth checking out if you’re interested in her anyway. 

As for the rest, I just hope you enjoy.  The other two essays are already written, and I’ll be posting them over the next two weeks! 

They are available in their entireties for my Patrons, so if you can spare me a buck a month you can get these early if you decide you like them enough. Higher reward tiers will let you invite friends to the Discord so they can read them too!

Feel free to @ me, reblog or send me an ask with your thoughts on these first two essays. There may be some things I can’t answer as they will be answered in later posts, but I might use those as inspiration for what teasers to release from sections of the next two essays over the course of the week.

You can also feel free to talk to me in the Hiveswap Discord where I moderate and cry about Homestuck. I’m very interested in seeing how my thoughts stand up to scrutiny, so don’t be shy!

[Youtube] [Patreon] [Hiveswap Discord

[Active/Passive Masterpost] [Steal and Serve] [Know and Change]

Keep Rising.

Just wanted to reblog this to mention that I made some heavy revisions and added a bunch more stuff, particularly making the Unifying Myth of Fairies far more compelling! 

There’s also some talk about Vriska, and I made some edits and added some graphics that should make it much easier to understand how I think the Class Active/Passive spectrum works as a whole. Finally, I also included Jane’s one reference to being a Fairy (that I’ve found so far). 

Special thanks to @ymawgat for sending me the questions that made me reevaluate a couple things in the canon and dig all this extra stuff up! This argument is both way more compelling and far easier to read now, I think, and I appreciate it. 

I also wanted to note that thanks to my financial situation improving, I’ve been able to lower my Patreon goals substantially! At this point, I’ve got something like 630 followers, so if less than half of them considered sending me three bucks a month, I’d be able to bring out new insights about Homestuck as a full-time job. 

You’d also join a Homestuck analysis community that has already proven exceptionally awesome 😉

Of course, I appreciate anyone’s attention and thoughts in response to my writing most of all! I just wanted to keep everyone updated on what the state of this project is. 

Force and Flow — Destroy and Create – optimisticDuelist – Medium

Here’s the first teaser for one of the next essays, on the Steal and Serve classes! Just a little morsel on Knight’s relationship to Pages–or anyone they view as such. 

You can access this essay early by hooking up with my Patreon–otherwise you’ll be able to read it on Thursday, when I post it here! You can also talk to me about it on the Hiveswap discord and on the r/Hiveswap subreddit. And here on Tumblr, obviously 😉

Keep rising,

[r/Hiveswap Subreddit]

[Youtube] [Patreon] [Hiveswap Discord]

[Active/Passive Masterpost] [Destroy and Create