Any time it comes to a female character being judged for her flaws you are going to see some level of misogyny. Conversely, any time you see for instance a gay man being judged for his flaws you are going to see some level of homophobia. It’s impossible for me to make any blanket statements about what sentiments come from where (and even if sentiments are coming from somewhere shitty, how much of that is internalized? How much of it is subconscious? How much of it is just unexamined repetition of an argument someone else made that the person repeating might not even realize originated with misogynist or homophobic roots?)
So, yeah. I see plenty of obvious bad faith discoursing in the fandom, sure, but the question of what antis are more vicious and why is really subjective. Depending on what circles you hang out in and what tags you browse and who you do or don’t have blocked on this egregious hell site, you’re going to have different experiences. I have no idea what the unfiltered fandom looks like anymore because I need to heavily curate my dash for my own damn sanity’s sake.
Like, by my own experiences, I would not call the common fandom reaction to Dirk Strider’s flaws “calm” by any measure or even the most loose definition of the word. From where I’m standing, the only character guaranteed to generate more unproductive discourse than Dirk is Vriska, lmao.
This is mostly how I would’ve tried to respond to you as well, anon. I’ll answer you in my own way but in fandom terms this is p much how I think about it.