staff:

🚨This is a Red Alert for net neutrality 🚨

Last December, the FCC voted to to kill net neutrality. If we do not take action, this will kill the free and open internet as we know it. The internet needs you—all of you—to make sure your voices are heard NOW.

We need all hands on deck for this one. It may be our last chance. If you’re feeling under-informed and overwhelmed about why net neutrality is so incredibly important, we have this handy guide just for you.

Here’s what you can do to save the internet:

  • In mid-May, the Senate will vote on a resolution to overrule the FCC using the Congressional Review Act (CRA). We only need one more vote in the Senate to win. Write or call your Senators or Representatives. You can also text BATTLE to 384-387 to get more information on how to write to your reps. You can do this, Tumblr.
  • Join us and dozens of your other favorite companies like Etsy, Vimeo, Reddit, and GitHub to raise awareness with the Red Alert campaign being run by Battle for the Net. Just add this small widget to your Tumblr to let your followers know how they can contact their reps. It’s as easy as copying and pasting the small line of code right into the customize theme page on the web.

This is important. This matters. It’s up to you to help. 

stormsbourne:

revolutionaryduelist:

nuclearmentality replied to your post “You reblogged a post that said “the only harm [non-photographic child…”

of course, it’s important to not discount the impact of propoganda-type works on the course of history

however, more often than not they are more accurately treated as symptoms than as causes

To be clear, yes, that’s definitely true. My shock wasn’t at the idea that BOTN was impactful, it factually was. But trying to pin the stubborn and long-lasting horror of white supremacy, an ideology that’s defined the world for like…centuries, on a single movie? It’s myopic to the point of being dangerously nonsensical.

That was my point here.

a lot of “birth of a nation caused the rebirth of the kkk” discourse is completely decontextualized from all the many, many things going on in the us culturally, such as continued fallout from the civil war and reconstruction, which were both still very culturally fresh in american memory at the time. propaganda is indeed always a danger but a lot of “aha! fiction DOES affect reality!” arguments tend to ignore that the reality was already there – and the fact that the reality was there is what allowed the fiction to exist in the first place. america was already racist. germany had already been slowly immersed in a tide of antisemitism and racism before nazi propaganda became commonplace. jaws was based on actual shark attack scares up and down the coast and did not, on its own, cause a mass slaughter of sharks. 

this is without getting into the fact that tumblr kids tend to consider propaganda and regular mainstream mass-marketed fiction and niche indie-produced fanfiction as being all on the same level of influence over the world, somehow. 

last discourse i’m doing on this honestly, this breaks it down too well not to boost. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s reclaimed, it’s still A Slur. People need it tagged for various reasons, I need fucking butterflies tagged because otherwise I have panic attacks, like 99% of people don’t mind doing that, but as soon as someone says they need q/eer tagged (even though it makes much more sense and is much more widespread in both its use and its negative effects) people throw up in arms

freedom-of-fanfic:

epee-de-la-revolution:

lines-and-edges:

freedom-of-fanfic:

Okay, hold up. This ask is conflating trigger tags/content warning tags with reclaiming slurs and using them as a personal label.

Triggers don’t have to be logical. If someone needs the word ‘queer’ to be tagged for because it gives them panic attacks/flashbacks/other trigger reactions – or even just because it’s an upsetting word to them – they are within their rights to ask for someone to tag it.

But ‘this word is upsetting/triggers me’ is a valid reason to ask for a tag all on its own. ‘Queer’ being Schrodinger’s Slur doesn’t ever have to come into the equation if you need it tagged for emotional/mental health reasons, and it doesn’t have to be remotely reasonable. Brains are weird and pick their hangups at seeming random sometimes.

Otoh, if you want ‘queer’ tagged or censored by someone else *because* you define it as a slur, you should probably be ready for a fight – especially if the person identifies as queer. because consider: you’re functionally telling them ‘that word is only for your oppressors to use against you. trying to take away their power to hurt you with this slur by taking it for yourself is not allowed because I – an unrelated third party – have not chosen to reclaim it myself or feel the word as a reclaimed label does not apply to me. As such, anyone whose experiences may be adjacent to mine should also not use this word in a positive way.’ It’s just invasive. And, if you’re not personally reclaiming ‘queer’, not really your business!

(On that note, I’m curious if you’d feel comfortable telling people who call themselves these other reclaimed or partially-reclaimed slurs that they can’t call themselves that/they need to tag for it/they need to censor the word in their posts because it’s a slur: Dyke. Slut. Whore. Bitch. Even Gay (which, incidentally, was the ubiquitous insult of my youth, treated as synonymous with ‘stupid’.) and this list is far from exhaustive.

I think the reason ppl are primarily going after queer as a reclaimed slur is because of a deliberate effort to ignore & erase the reclamation history of ‘queer’ – a reclamation that was so near-complete (in the US) that college classes were named ‘queer studies’ – so that a label with purposefully fuzzy edges and definition would pass out of common, unquestioned use, making it easier to determine who is ‘allowed’ to be LGBT+ and who isn’t. But that doesn’t mean everyone has to claim queer as an identity or that it hasn’t been used to hurt anyone. I just want people who accept ‘the q word is an unreclaimed slur and always has been’ narratives to think critically about where they got it from.)

The point is: identities are messy, and a lot of minority identities (and ppl in widely denigrated employments, like sex work, and/or nonmonogamous sexually active women and/or ppl misgendered as women in general, etc) have names that are or were slurs. Some people choose to reclaim and own those slurs, and telling them ‘it makes me uncomfortable so please censor your label’ is kinda shitty.

So if someone uses a word as a label that you cannot stand to see, even in the context of being reclaimed as a self-identifier/proud label, you should probably just block that person so you can’t see it anymore. You can also use blacklist functions and tumblr’s tag filtering features to help you avoid slurs being used as reclaimed labels. (And This is also where I remind people – including myself – to carefully consider what to censor with asterisks or slashes b/c doing so can put triggers past blacklist functions. and remember to tag if you do choose to censor certain words.)

Good post! Also, I will recommend that people who need to not ever wish to see a particular word use the desktop version of Tumblr with Xkit, which allows more extensive blacklisting than Tumblr’s own settings. (The only thing that won’t block is images with words in them; and content tagging is still good and I generally support it. But Xkit will save you from seeing posts with particular text in them.)

I’d just like to add to FoF’s very good answer: you can always ask someone to tag for the word queer. But that Does Not Mean that they have to. Trigger-warning for your own identity can be extremely taxing, and a person does NOT owe that emotional labour. Your mental health does not come before theirs, and I wish that was more acknowledged in these debates, and that it was more widely accepted that it’s not always as cut and dry as “if you don’t tag for triggers, you’re an asshole”. Part of me wonders how much that social rule of tumblr has been used to coerce queer people into treating their own identities like awful words even when they didn’t want to.

Good addition that’s very important! I meant to say this explicitly but forgot to.

tatterdemalionamberite:

apparentlyeverything:

si-vis-amari-amo:

soulsoaker:

datclassydame:

soulsoaker:

this might be a bit of a reach but in the wake of so-called “progressives” advocating for creating a list of mentally ill people and handing it over to the cops, on top of things like forced institutionalization and universities expelling students who they deem too crazy to function, I do not want to hear ANY of you people whining about why we don’t just see a doctor and Start Recovering.

Just either admit you have no fucking clue how dangerous it can be to live at the mercy of incompetent bureaucracies that convinced themselves they can do no harm, or that you’re just annoyed that mentally ill people write things where you can see them. Fuck off

Source, please?

One of the Parkland demands is changing healthcare privacy laws so mental healthcare providers can communicate with law enforcement  which for obvious reasons totally misses the causes of gun violence (the Parkland shooter was a white supremacist) and puts the lives of patients in the hands of a doctor’s opinion. This is going to kill people, especially Black people, and discourage many more from seeking healthcare. People with mental illnesses already make up about half of all people shot and killed by police.

It’s really disturbing how people spent years trying to debunk the “mentally ill people are murderers” myth whenever right-wingers used it to attack gun control but the moment you get some cute white kids to say crazy people should be locked up everyone’s cool with it. scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds

I’ve seen this a few times, and I just want to say that if you look at the actual March for Our Lives webpage, marchforourlives.com, it says nothing about changing healthcare privacy laws. Specifically, this link lists what they want to change. Also, if you look at which students wrote the editorial, none of them are the ones that have been organizing the march, and the Guardian article is not listed on the website under their press section. 

Many of the students at Parkland may have different demands, and it’s important to distinguish who you’re talking about because of that. You can’t just say Parkland as a whole.

The manifesto published in the Guardian was written by editors from the school newspaper. As mentioned above, it’s not the position of the march organizers, and it’s been widely criticized by progressives/liberals on twitter who support gun control. It’s the pro-gun lobby and its supporters who’ve been trying to frame this as a “mental health” issue instead, and they’re the ones pushing for these kind of changes as a way to derail gun control. The fact that it showed up on this one list doesn’t mean that liberals have suddenly adopted this position. The gun control movement isn’t relying on 17 year olds to write their policy positions. 

I’ve heard that the student organizers in question have been trying to direct attention off of themselves and toward black student movements in interviews and that this has been HEAVILY underreported unless you watch said interviews directly.

So it’s not a big surprise to me that we’re getting some (additional kinds of) spin about them right now.

fullhalalalchemist:

the GOP is aiming for a $6.5 TRILLION tax cut for the rich by this year. to do this, they’re just gonna pass this bill, which will definetely bankrupt the federal govt, and so to not bankrupt the govt they’re gonna cut programs like Pell Grants, Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security…..basically every program that benefits the poor, minorities, women…

FIGHT. THIS.

call your house rep: https://www.house.gov/

call your senate rep: https://www.senate.gov/

call your governor: https://www.nga.org/cms/governors/bios

date: October 26 2017.

part 1. part 2.

vampireapologist:

finnglas:

missvisibleninja:

ophidiae:

the-hermit-in-her-cave:

destinyrush:

I just wanna talk to whoever thought this was a good idea

This is probably even more shady than it seems. They raise the rates and then less people go. Low attendance numbers leads to that park getting less attention and less money. This discourages new parks and devalues current parks. Then the government can be like “lol people don’t care about nature let’s drill” Parks and libraries should be free places for people to enrich themselves, but smart sheep aren’t worth anything 🐑

^^^This. It’s why they’re also slashing park funding. According to the linked article, the current budget proposal includes:

  • Cutting base operating funding by $132 million, affecting at least
    90 percent of parks. This includes cuts to law enforcement, health and
    safety, natural and cultural resource projects, and volunteer and youth
    programs.
  • Cutting 1,242 staff positions.
  • A 37 percent cut to the Historic Preservation Fund.
  • A drastic cut to federal Land and Water Conservation Fund, which
    helps parks purchase private lands within park boundaries from willing
    sellers that would otherwise be vulnerable to inappropriate commercial
    or residential development.
  • Elimination of the National Heritage Area program, which preserves
    large historic landscapes managed through innovative partnerships.

Combined with the drastic rate hike, it’s hard to see this as anything other than a ploy to force park closures. 

This proposal is currently open for public comments and will be open until November 23.

Click here to write a comment

Comments can be written by anyone. You don’t have to live in America.

Please write a comment saying how much you love the parks or a certain park or why you think this is a bad idea. If you don’t live in America write something about how you travel here to see the parks or how you wish that your country had a park service like America (the American government loves having its ego stroked)

Public comments are the only thing the park service is going to see. They aren’t going to see how many notes this post gets, they’re going to look at that comments page to see how many people they would tick off it they did this. So please, reblog this post but go comment, it’s the only way to let the parks service know how you feel.

PLEASE do this ^^^

PLEASE go comment!!!

jackietplease:

hogwartshousespersonality:

afatblackfairy:

wetheurban:

HOW TO HELP TORTURED GAY MEN IN CHECHNYA

We can’t allow this to continue. A petition has also been launched by change.org and signed by tens of thousands of people.

It demands a full investigation of all the facts and unlawful repression in Chechnya of the LGBT population and calls for punishment for the ‘guilty parties’ and the end to the practice of extra-judicial violence.

You can sign that here.

Instagram.com/WeTheUrban

Can y’all share this please???

Guys, we’re sorry this is not Harry Potter related but we couldn’t let it pass. This is important, it deserves attention and this is the biggest plataform we have.

We urge you to not ignore this. You can make a difference and your help matters. Please, guys, this can’t keep going on.

As a member of the LGBTQ+ community, my soul is broken right now. As an empathetic human being, so is my heart.

We must support each other, who else will? Please share this