Okay, hold up. This ask is conflating trigger tags/content warning tags with reclaiming slurs and using them as a personal label.
Triggers donât have to be logical. If someone needs the word âqueerâ to be tagged for because it gives them panic attacks/flashbacks/other trigger reactions – or even just because itâs an upsetting word to them – they are within their rights to ask for someone to tag it.
But âthis word is upsetting/triggers meâ is a valid reason to ask for a tag all on its own. âQueerâ being Schrodingerâs Slur doesnât ever have to come into the equation if you need it tagged for emotional/mental health reasons, and it doesnât have to be remotely reasonable. Brains are weird and pick their hangups at seeming random sometimes.
Otoh, if you want âqueerâ tagged or censored by someone else *because* you define it as a slur, you should probably be ready for a fight – especially if the person identifies as queer. because consider: youâre functionally telling them âthat word is only for your oppressors to use against you. trying to take away their power to hurt you with this slur by taking it for yourself is not allowed because I – an unrelated third party – have not chosen to reclaim it myself or feel the word as a reclaimed label does not apply to me. As such, anyone whose experiences may be adjacent to mine should also not use this word in a positive way.â Itâs just invasive. And, if youâre not personally reclaiming âqueerâ, not really your business!
(On that note, Iâm curious if youâd feel comfortable telling people who call themselves these other reclaimed or partially-reclaimed slurs that they canât call themselves that/they need to tag for it/they need to censor the word in their posts because itâs a slur: Dyke. Slut. Whore. Bitch. Even Gay (which, incidentally, was the ubiquitous insult of my youth, treated as synonymous with âstupidâ.) and this list is far from exhaustive.
I think the reason ppl are primarily going after queer as a reclaimed slur is because of a deliberate effort to ignore & erase the reclamation history of âqueerâ – a reclamation that was so near-complete (in the US) that college classes were named âqueer studiesâ – so that a label with purposefully fuzzy edges and definition would pass out of common, unquestioned use, making it easier to determine who is âallowedâ to be LGBT+ and who isnât. But that doesnât mean everyone has to claim queer as an identity or that it hasnât been used to hurt anyone. I just want people who accept âthe q word is an unreclaimed slur and always has beenâ narratives to think critically about where they got it from.)
The point is: identities are messy, and a lot of minority identities (and ppl in widely denigrated employments, like sex work, and/or nonmonogamous sexually active women and/or ppl misgendered as women in general, etc) have names that are or were slurs. Some people choose to reclaim and own those slurs, and telling them âit makes me uncomfortable so please censor your labelâ is kinda shitty.
So if someone uses a word as a label that you cannot stand to see, even in the context of being reclaimed as a self-identifier/proud label, you should probably just block that person so you canât see it anymore. You can also use blacklist functions and tumblrâs tag filtering features to help you avoid slurs being used as reclaimed labels. (And This is also where I remind people – including myself – to carefully consider what to censor with asterisks or slashes b/c doing so can put triggers past blacklist functions. and remember to tag if you do choose to censor certain words.)
Good post! Also, I will recommend that people who need to not ever wish to see a particular word use the desktop version of Tumblr with Xkit, which allows more extensive blacklisting than Tumblrâs own settings. (The only thing that wonât block is images with words in them; and content tagging is still good and I generally support it. But Xkit will save you from seeing posts with particular text in them.)