Nah his stuff parses as pretty Blood oriented to me. He’s super concerned with the relationships enforced by society and how they enact violence/lack of choice on each other. That’s all blood stuff.
Hope is highly idealistic, it’s rooted in the imaginary and abstract. Kankri isn’t focusing on abstract ideals, he’s focusing on the material power dynamics he observed in the physical world of beforus.
That doesn’t mean he’s right or accurately assessing/prioritizing what he sees in that world, though. Just that that’s what he’s focusing.
There’s usually an explicit or implied source of influence when a player roleplays, like an ancestor figure or societal norms with the castes. I don’t think kankris implied to have anything like that other than his karmic connection to the sufferer/Karkat.
I DO think he’s drawn to/lightly exhibits some typically Knightly traits–he views himself as being of service to others, and wants to take people under his wing. apprentice them, basically, as knights seem rather inclined to do.
P sure Porrim even asks Karkat if he’s interested in what Kankri is “serving” at one point. So I do think he’s hampered by roleplaying, I just don’t think it’s got much to do with hope.
Kankri isn’t ignoring the blood part of his class, but the Seer part. Just look at how often he talks with his eyes closed. He chooses to live in the tumblr-esque fantasy world of fictitious/irrelevant problems rather than see the actual ones in front of him (the team falling apart, Porrim’s legit social justice concerns).
I think this is a great example of a person not embracing or working with their class at all. Much in the same way Rose embraces blind rage to go grimdark or Terezi had her vision restored and lost her sense of self, Kankri seems to be stuck or arrested in his development as a seer. He didn’t respond to the challenges of SGRUB because he’d never had to DO anything before, he could just pontificate ad nauseam. Also, he’s an idiot.
On a serious note, I wonder if questioning their vision/learning to trust themselves is a trial all seers must go through. It certainly seems that way from the seers we have examples of.
Pretty much exactly this, I agree. And re: seers’ recurring challenge, I’m inclined to agree! I haven’t nailed this down to any 1:1 canonical basis in a way i feel super comfortable arguing for, but it seems to me that the classes have a looot of resonance with Carol S. Pearson’s 12 heroic archetypes
Check out the description for the Sage, which seems to me like a pretty close match for Seers and Mages both, if Seers a bit moreso:

In particular:

And:


