OP: I love the idea that hes a lord of blood but from his true sign id have to say he’s either a rouge or mage of time, giving the mc time while also being able to see the other timelines.

Someone from WP debunked the idea that that was his actual sign, tho. Unless that was a double lie, its something different.

Hussie Quote: “Watching the kids figure out ways to hack the game is about as important to the story as watching them figure out how the game itself works in the first place. This is because the story is first about the game and the subversion of the game, and then about the narrative and the subversion of that narrative.”

OP: Wait a second, haven’t you been saying that all along? :O

I hadn’t thought about it as a direct progression from Game to Narrative, but in the sense of the story ultimately being about subverting the story/LE as author? Yeah kinda, which is pretty gratifying. He mentioned platonic idealism directly a couple of times, which was also pretty vindicating.

The Meat/Candy Binary-Homestuck Book Commentary Submission

OP: Hey, I thought I’d share this commentary I saw in book 3 about [S] Jack: Ascend, because I thought you’d probably find it as interesting as I do (also it’s too big for an ask so I have to do it as a submission sorry):

Hussie quote: “[…] I think this one marks the start of Homestuck’s trend thereafter of dropping exceptionally violent, high-octane, game-changing animations out of nowhere. There are so many like this from on, right up to the end of Act 5. Only then does the number sort of taper off. But from this point on I just sorta started shoveling more and more red meat into the story’s maw. This stretch is where I was starting to get a feel for this type of sensationalistic storytelling content as something I’d later code (mostly for my own internal purposes) as “meat,” in the meat/candy binary of storycraft theory. I really shouldn’t talk about this yet, though. It’s too soon.”

This quote threw me for a loop, to be honest, and I’ve been mulling it over the last couple days. I wasn’t sure what the Meat/Candy binary was referring to at all, I was just kind of like uhh wtf?

Then I remembered this exchange, and I think things started coming together:

Meat and Candy are all Caliborn/Calliope eat. Which makes sense, since they’re the ultimate audience stand ins.  Hussie gives us a good sense of what Meat means in his description: Very violent, very game-changing animations that move the story forward. Parts where people die and/or Get Shit done, usually delivered with a lot of visual spectacle.

Caliborn gives us a pretty hefty clue as to the second. Odds seem good “Candy” refers to shipping, or at least the very particular kind of shipping Caliborn is interested in.

Which is to say, Caliborn isn’t interested in watching Roxy and Jane have a real relationship, or grow as people, or wrestle with real feelings. He’s interested in the physical titillation they can provide him with by acting out the cute parts of a relationship. See also: Trickster Mode, where the characters indulge candy and become saccharine sweet and affectionate to each other while being entirely detached from their conflicts and issues.

Unsurprisingly, Caliborn’s also only interested in “candy” that caters specifically to his own sexuality, insofar as he consciously performs it.

So basically, Meat and Candy both provide different forms of titillation and satisfying “content”, from the fandom’s perspective. Meat gives us raw plot, the satisfaction of Things Happening, steaks being raised, etc. Candy gives us shipping fodder, absent conflict and growth that real relationships require.

This log also introduces a third concept into the equation, presenting an alternative to the Meat/Candy binary:
Pumpkins, or Vegetables.

The implications of this one seem fairly obvious to me. Vegetables may not be tasty or satisfying to eat, but they’re good for you and necessary to a healthy body. Eating one’s vegetables is considered a sign of maturity, or at least being on the path to maturity.

I’m going to guess that in this framework, vegetables refers to content depicting the characters actually reckoning with themselves, facing their feelings and flaws, and growing as people, friends, and relationship partners. This is explicitly built into Dirk and Jake’s relationship symbolically, but really it applies to every endgame ship and to the character’s arcs more generally. Caliborn doesn’t give a shit about anything that has to do with the characters actually growing up.

Pumpkins are also Void items, which makes me wonder. If the most “important” romantic relationships for each character, the ones that help them grow as people, are the ones considered “Pumpkin” matter in the story, maybe that goes some way to explaining why we get so little explicitly romantic affection shown between, say, Vrisrezi, Davekat, and Dirkjake. That’s candy.

If that last idea is accurate to the story’s internal logic, it makes me think of this quote from The Little Prince:

It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.

Anyway if I’m right about this at all, the real takeaway is that @sam-keeper​ was writing about this aspect of Homestuck openly way back in 2016. So, you know. Homestuck was good and meaningfully constructed all along, and everyone should listen to Sam forever. What else is new.

@catchaloststar submitted:

That Gamzee explanation is pretty convincing, but it relies on the assumption that Gamzee has no ghosts + dream merger mechanics -> Gamzee never successfully saved his friends -> Gamzee is a murderous asshole who never chooses his friends over his murderous tendencies and LE loyalty. Note, of course, that I inserted the word “successfully.” Perhaps Gamzee’s immortality is a separate mechanic due to being a “rascally clown” as Hussie says, rather than simply out-surviving (or killing) the others? Aradia notes that the beta trolls fucked up their session multiple times, making victory unobtainable, without actually implying that Gamzee was responsible for each fuck-up. It seems plausible that the other beta trolls are perfectly capable of ruining their own session without Gamzee’s interference or even with his cooperation, considering how many Aradiabots had to step in and help Karkat here and there just due to his own stupid actions. Or something just didn’t loop correctly despite perfectly good yet still incorrect behavior, triggering a doomed offshoot that resulted in the surviving trolls all eventually dying of old age and leaving Gamzee. Several possible explanations, you know?

Anyway, what I’m suggesting is a scenario kind of like that old tumblr post with a picture of a Seer of Time standing alone on the Battlefield surrounded by their dead friends’ corpses, followed by a lot of speculation about immortal god tiered players in doomed timelines. Or a different post that suggests all doomed Gamzees become purple-blooded Horrorterrors rather than ghosts. Both fan-created theories, of course, but not theories that are contradicted by the source material (yet). (I can probably dig those posts up if you need them, just let me know.)

My theory in turn relies on Gamzee’s immortality being solely and independenrly due to his clownishness, rather than as a result of various other actions. Hussie “confirmed” on his formspring that Gamzee doesn’t die because he’s a “rascally clown,” but who knows how serious his formspring responses are. Maybe his being a juggalo actually refers to being a disciple of the juggalo religion, which brings us back to LE loyalty. In-comic Hussie tells Caliborn that “you can’t keep down the clown,” which Gamzee seems to support by taking an entire automatic rifle’s magazine and still being alive – but I guess you could argue that he was expressing his loyalty to LE in that scene, hence unable to die while in pursuit of that task? It’s theories all the way down. Anyway what do you think.

My main issue isn’t so much that such scenarios are impossible as it is that I think they’re begging the question a little. Occam’s razor, you know? While stuff like players turning into horrorterrors and stuff is fun, yeah, and they’re potential explanations…they’re also explanations the canon never brings up.

I tend to part from the starting premise that Homestuck is in most things a coherent and well-structured story, that tells the audience what it thinks is important for the audience to know. So coming up with fanon explanations for something we HAVE a canonical explanation for, just one that leads us to some conclusions that are pretty unpleasant, just doesn’t really mesh with my particular methodology too well. 

I do think Gamzee’s immortality is due to his clownishness, but I view the link between those two things as Gamzee’s Rage aspect. Immortality=Clowns works because, well, it’s contrived and infuriating, and infuriating plot contrivances are part of the language Rage exists to describe. 

All of this said, @hussianphilosopher raised some good critical counterpoints to that Gamzee post that I’m looking to incorporate into an expanded piece on Gamzee when I port that little post to Medium. I don’t really think that post is the most accurate take on Gamzee anymore. 

I’m just not sure when I’ll get the chance to present this slightly different context
😦 As soon as I can, I guess. 

The neverending Page & Knight discourse

I’ll start off with saying that your ideas on the Page and Knight classes are a pretty fresh take, clearly original ideas that draw from a solid foundation in the canon.

From your explanations however, I think that the Knight is the active class, and Page the passive, given that the only direct canon explanation for what the passive/active distinction amounts to is that active classes directly do something with their aspect, and passive classes invite others to do that same thing. The knight herself is still Serving, whereas the page is still inviting others to Serve, regardless of whether they are serving him. Just because Serving seems to imply acting for another person doesn’t mean it’s any different than the Prince who can destroy others (aspect). Both are acting impressing their will on another, the distinction being that one is trying to help, the other is most likely hurting.

However, I can’t say I’m convinced on Serve being the primary verb for the pair. This debate is a old as the classes themselves, yet we still find ourselves here. Serve is good, and you’ve found evidence for it, but I say it’s not Enough.

From my own theory crafting experience, I’ve cycled through most of the different words thought of as being the Key Verb. Be it Exploit (which really works for Dave’s time looping powers, and to a lesser extent Karkats victory over Clover) Wield or Use (which I then extrapolated to mean the knight was some sort of item using class, that they had a favored weapon that they could summon, an aspect themed mount, or perhaps a batman like toolbelt that contained a variety of aspect aligned tools that only they are proficient in using, eventually boiling it down to the idea that the Knight can use aspect associated items without any difficulty) as well as Protect (the knights armor is such a sound power concept). The most clear non HS example I could think of was Guts from Berserk, who is the Knight of Rage (though anyone with the Brand becomes an Heir of Doom). Guts’ dragonslayer sword is described as being more a slab of iron than a blade, basically the thing is way to big for a human, he was Wielding a Contrivance. That, and he eventually obtains the berserker armor, which protects him with his rage (protect being a strong word here, but it let’s him keep going). The Page I’ve described as the sidekick, the one who puts Armor on other people, who brings them their weapon, or car keys, given the knights penchant for having a mount. Anthy himemiyas ability to pull a sword out of her or others chest seems on surface level to be a obvious page move (Another time I’d like to discuss with you whether or not Anthy was a Page, or if the swords were complete powers in of themselves, metaphorically far more than swords, making her a Muse. But I digress)

I’m Making/playing a Sburb tabletop game with some of my friends, and the Knight of Doom has never been satisfied with his powers, and I have changed them over and over again to no avail, which Is why I have looked at the knight through so many lenses.

The most recent idea I’ve had for the Knight is something I’ve not seen touched on. When I asked my Rogue of Mind to describe what a knight traditionally is, he gave me a simplistic, shounen answer of how knights go around challenging others for the honor of their lord, and to test their mettle. I thought it was silly, until I realized the Knights in canon all did that in some form. Knights seem to challenge others to a competition related to their aspect. Dave regularly got into Rap Battles with the trolls, as well as Ironic oneupsmanship games. Karkat incessantly Argued with people, especially over Relationships and Team related things. And latula played video games I guess. The same thing is also present in the pages, to a lesser extent. Tavros was an avid fiduspawn player. Jake physically fought the dirkbots, while also playing romantic games with the alphas (while relationships are Blood, and your preferences are Heart, I give Eridan and Jake as examples that Unrequited Feelings are Hopes domain). I’ve got nothing for Horuss, which maybe is part of it? I’ve struggled with whether to call this Fight or Compete. It’s pretty obvious once you look back at it, but it still leaves questions; how do we find a word that includes the concept of Protect, Wield, Exploit, Use, Serve and Fight? They all have grounds in the canon, and all of the classes have to have one Key Verb to them. So what is it?

Also, should you find this all interesting, Check out the game I am developing, SKRUB: a Tabletop Creation Myth, a pen and paper role-playing game made to give players a complete Sburb experience.

so shit kinda hit the fan for me and i am mostly cleanin up and getting ready for some announcements, so im gonna keep this pretty short, i just wanna knock a bunch of asks out of the way:

1) once i like, can, i’d love to talk about Anthy. I’ve been reading her as a Witch or a Muse depending on my mood–I don’t really think she’s a Page at all, though I can see how you’d think so if you read them as Passive. On which point,

given that the only direct canon explanation for what the passive/active distinction amounts to is that active classes directly do something with their aspect, and passive classes invite others to do that same thing.

That’s not true? That isn’t the description of Passive classes, for starters. Passive classes invite the Aspect Itself to act through them, or invite Y action onto the Aspect. That can include influencing others, but it also includes simply acting as a channel for the “will of the Aspect” itself. 

Calliope gives us the “For themselves” vs. “For others” definition seperately, but I don’t really see a reason to single that one out as Class-specific while not doing so for the description she gives for Prince/Bard. And all classes employ both “exploit” and “allow” behaviors at various times. 

Hence why I think understanding the classes is easier when you parse whether they tend to benefit themselves or others. 

Protect, Wield, Exploit, Use, Serve and Fight

They all have grounds in the canon, and all of the classes have to have one Key Verb to them. So what is it?

It’s Serve. Hiveswap makes me even more certain, since it’s way less subtle. For starters, I don’t really think Wield, Exploit and Use make sense as Knight/Page verbs. 

Eridan, Vriska, Roxy, Rose, and countless others can be said to “Wield” their aspect like a weapon through items–the dice, roxy’s cubes, eridan and rose’s wands, etc. Rose can easily be said to be “using” Light when she uses the cueball Scratch gives her. And “Exploit” is basically synonymous with the idea of “using” one’s aspect directly, as Active classes are said to do. 

There’s way more examples than I can even count, but basically I think all of those verbs are too general. As for Protect, it falls under the Serve verb under the idea of “Service”, which can mean to help someone or to literally be in their service. Redglare is referenced as a civil servant in allegiance to the Subjugglators, for example. 

Help is a concept strongly associated with Knights and Pages, and often in terms of providing protection. Jake “invites” Dirk to give him Heart through the form of a bodyguard doppleganger that is referenced as a butler, and the Brobot later literally Serves Jake his heart like a butler offering it up on a platter–giving it to him, which falls under the second definition of Serve. 

The “Fight” verb also falls into Serve as it’s third interpretation, because to Serve someone can also mean to own them completely or kick their ass–Caliborn directly references this definition. “You got Served”, etc. 

This, by the way, is a big reason I think Knights are Passive and Pages Active. Knights are invested in working hard to protect and Serve others, while Pages are more inclined to get others to Serve them–and that can be contentious on both ends given the “fight” association, but at their respective bests Knights are still predominantly working for the benefit of other people, while Pages are rallying others to work for their own benefit. 

RE: The tabletop game, i’ve been interested in tabletop sburb potential for years, so I’d def love to check it out! could you drop me a link? 

So here’s the theories

https://taksynator.tumblr.com/post/162956042466/homestuck-theory https://taksynator.tumblr.com/post/163353494091/another-homestuck-theory https://taksynator.tumblr.com/post/165287519776/masterclass-thoughts thanks in advance for reviewing them ^u^


@taksynator  No problem, it’s a pleasure! If you don’t mind, I’ll outline my thoughts here:

https://taksynator.tumblr.com/post/165287519776/masterclass-thoughts

https://taksynator.tumblr.com/post/163353494091/another-homestuck-theory

As for these two, I agree pretty much entirely! I think absolute power over a particular domain is well within the description of both Muses and Lords–though I will admit, the thing about Lord English and the sand kind of lost me a little? i didn’t quite follow. I’d say that their domains in Homestuck are, well. Homestuck itself. IE-The narrative. 

I also agree that Lords and Muses find themselves dealing in their complementary (saying “inverse” brings us too close to inversion theory for me, I think, but it’s as good a descriptor as any) Aspect as well, I think that’s a sweet catch on your part. Lord English is demonstrably interested in Space, after all–going so far as to give himself first guardian powers.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1naZNQSZTcpOEABFeh-V6JRmY_YwyLE9DQDMpBQ4A9RY/edit

As for this compilation of the Classes, It was quite the interesting read! For the most part we agree, and I think the Aspect “gauges” are an interesting way to visualize classpect dynamics. I like it a lot! There’s a couple of things I’m not sure I remember too well–I don’t remember Kanaya making clothes for anyone but Vriska, who did most definitely wear the fairy dress she made her, for example.

But the only thing I really disagree with is the conception of Knights and Pages. I’m pretty well on record as thinking Knights and Pages are best described by the verb Serve, and that Knights are Passive, with Pages as Active. 

I also think that “buffs”/”debuffs” as a concept are probably best applied to the spectrum of Passive classes, though I definitely agree the concept applies pretty strongly to the Steal/Serve (in your reading Move/Use) quartet of classes.

All in all these were a fun read and really interesting! Thanks for sharing :))

catchaloststar submitted:

Hey I totally forget if I already asked you this, but I was reminded by your recent post that I had a question for you about Sylphs and fairies and Vriska’s roleplaying.

Hussie said on his formspring once while talking about god tiers that “Vriska’s true form is that of a pesky, murderous luck fairy,” which seems to go against your theory that Vriska is unhealthily roleplaying her ancestor’s god tier and is not, herself, a fairy at all. https://classesandaspects.tumblr.com/post/130602203382/hussie-god-tier 

How do you reconcile Hussie’s statement with your theory? (Death of the Author is an acceptable answer.)

If you did ask, I never saw it! I think I’ve seen this quote before, come to think of it.

I wouldn’t really use DotA to discard theories because I’m primarily interested in trying to understand the comic as cohesively as possible, and Hussie’s quotes re: mindset with developing it has helped me consider how best to read it many times.

I’d really only say that this particular quote kinda has to be taken in context.
The thing is, Vriska IS definitely a fairy for the entirety of Act 5. It’s coded into the language she’s presented with both textually and visually across the whole deal.

When I say Vriska is a “false fairy”, I don’t mean that she’s incapable of creating a version of herself that plays the role. What I mean is that the roleplaying itself is toxic and unhealthy for her (holding to her Mindfang persona literally kills her, after all), and so it’s ultimately discarded as her character grows. 

The question for me is: why was that element so completely dropped later?
And why is the myth of the Fairy so consistently tied to the Maid and Sylph classes–with the exception of cases like Vriska and Tavros, for whom behaving as fairies ends atrociously?

Hussie has always been cagey about telling us exactly what’s going on. So weighed against the evidence in the comic, I’m inclined to think he’s just leaving stuff out here, given that this quote is from Act 5–before we even knew the Dancestors and could put this stuff together.

schaftman submitted:

Hey dude, I noticed your blog while i was digging through theories, and I just sacrificed my sleep cuz i felt the need to theorize on the endgame, soooo check it out and give me some input?

https://stardustytrails.tumblr.com/cycletheory

(you can post this if you want idc)


I think the alternate timeline theory is pretty good, I know a couple of people who subscribe to something similar! And that you came to conclusions similar to mine with regards to the time loop as a whole is gratifying. Thanks for sending me this, it was a fun read!

I’m not super sure about the alternate timeline theory, really only because it seems to me [S] Credits is clearly foreshadowing the Masterpiece happening next. As for what that resolution means, that’s ending speculation, which I’m not touching. I have a lot of guesses for what might possibly happen in the epilogue, but I’m expecting Homestuck to surprise me. 

I’ll definitely be revisiting stuff like this once the Epilogue happens though! I’ll be interested in seeing how it changes our perceptions, if it does.